🔗 Share this article

Throughout last year's race for the White House, the former president courted voters with promises to lower prices starting on day one. But, after he assumed office, he seemed to pay minimal focus to the cost of living. This shifted after price-fatigued citizens expressed dissatisfaction at the ballot box. Within days, the Trump administration launched a slapdash effort to tackle affordability. Unfortunately, this initiative is a disorganized endeavor—characterized by illogical claims, contradictions, magical thinking, scapegoating, and Trumpian dishonesty.

Detached Assertions and Supermarket Truth

Merely 48 hours after the election, Trump began his cost-reduction push with a disastrous remark: “Food prices are way down. Everything is way down… So I don’t want to hear about affordability.” This comment from the wealthy leader—who frequently mingles with fellow billionaires—revealed utter contempt for everyday citizens who struggle when visiting supermarkets. Essentially, he ignored their struggles as trivial, implying they were mistaken about actual costs.

His assertion about declining prices was highly misleading and inaccurate. How could all costs be falling when his cherished tariffs were increasing prices? Official statistics indicate banana prices increased nearly 7% over the past year, beef prices went up 14.7%, and coffee prices surged by nearly 19%—partly due to punitive tariffs applied to Brazilian products. In the first three quarters, prices rose in the majority of main grocery groups monitored by the Consumer Price Index, including meats, poultry, and fish (rising over 4%), non-alcoholic beverages (increasing nearly 3%), and produce (up 1.3%).

Inconsistencies and Falsehoods in Financial Claims

Despite these numbers, the president continues to push his big lie about lower costs. Since election day, he has claimed there is “almost no price increases,” declared “prices are way down,” and asserted “it is far less expensive under Trump than it was under his predecessor.” These statements ignore the reality that general costs have unarguably risen since Biden left office. Currently, price growth is running at a 3% annual rate, which is 50% higher than the Federal Reserve’s target of 2 percent. Adding to the inaccuracies, Trump boasted that gas prices had fallen to around two dollars, despite official data show they are $3.19.

Faced with reality and declining opinion polls, advisers evidently warned that his “costs are falling” message portrayed him as dangerously out of touch from ordinary people. Many citizens are frustrated about prices continuing to climb following assurances of decreases. As a result, advisers suggested one quick fix: roll back some of Trump’s beloved tariffs. The logical move clashed with Trump’s absurd assertion that new tariffs would not increase costs for US consumers.

Suggested Fixes and Their Potential Impact

As some tariffs being rolled back on several food items, Trump will likely claim that he has cut prices once those foods begin to fall in price. That would be similar to a firestarter taking credit for extinguishing a blaze that he had started. On another occasion, while speaking McDonald’s executives, Trump declared that “this is the peak period of America” and told the audience that “prices are coming down and all of that stuff.” These comments come naturally for a billionaire to make, but seem insincere to countless households facing hardships—particularly when many risk cuts to nutrition assistance or rising insurance costs.

According to a survey from October, 74% of Americans believe economic conditions are fair or poor, while just a quarter consider them good or excellent. A separate survey showed that a majority of citizens feel Trump’s policies have “worsened economic conditions” in the country.

Financial Truth and Suggested Steps

Scott Bessent, Trump’s chief financial officer, lately disputed claims of a golden age. He stated that instead of thriving, some parts of the American economy “have contracted.” Industrial production—a priority for the administration—seems to have shrunk for eight months in a row and shed around 33,000 jobs since January. Citing this weakness, Bessent called on the Federal Reserve to reduce borrowing costs—an action that could help affordability.

In response to widespread concern about affordability, the president suggested a direct payment of “a dividend of at least $2,000 a person” excluding “high income people.” For many households in need, it seems like manna from heaven, but it is unlikely that Congress—concerned about huge budget deficits—will enact such a plan. This idea could raise government expenditure, push up interest rates, and potentially drive prices higher by injecting cash into consumers’ pockets.

Another supposed fix for affordability centered on creating half-century home loans, with the notion that this would lower housing costs. But, reality is that such lengthy loans would do little to lower monthly payments—frequently cutting them by a small amount each month. The downside is that these loans could significantly increase the overall cost borrowers pay and hinder building home value.

Faulting the Past Government and Financial Outlook

As part of their cost-cutting effort, the administration have once more pointed fingers at Biden for financial challenges, including rising prices. Spokespeople claimed they “faced a mess from Joe Biden” and were “cleaning up the prior administration’s price hikes.” These are absurd and inaccurate allegations. In reality, the former president left a strong economy, with inflation way down, economic growth strong, and unemployment low. But, the current administration’s actions—particularly his tariffs—have resulted in an difficult situation, driving costs higher and reducing economic output.

According to an economist, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, 22 states are already in recession, with their economies damaged by Trump’s tariffs. Zandi worries that if large states like major economies enter a downturn, the nation could slide into a widespread recession. In downturns, consumers typically have less money to spend, and inflation often falls. Sadly, with the highly-touted cost initiative likely to do little to control costs, his most effective “tool” for achieving increased affordability might end up triggering an economic contraction—something that struggling Americans cannot handle.