🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. ACA. HMO. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Neither the average employee. Selecting the appropriate medical coverage for our business – or for our families – appears to require demands a PhD in medical insurance.

The Healthcare System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Costly

According to recent research, typical households pays $27,000 annually for their health insurance (up 6% compared to last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is projected to surpass $17,000 per employee by 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning because partisan disputes regarding tax credits which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program in the United States? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare system – an established insurance framework – simply expand to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. How medical professionals get paid changes. Believe me, they will adjust.

The Way Universal Coverage Would Work

A national health insurance program would need contributions from both workers and companies. In similar programs, a worker earning moderate income must contribute about five point three percent to their healthcare. Their employer pays about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear like a lot? Unless you contrast that with what the typical American pays. I can name multiple clients who are routinely paying anywhere from 8% to 15% of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that in comprehensive systems, these contributions include retirement benefits, illness coverage, parental benefits and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting healthcare facilities. When you add those costs compared with what we pay on retirement programs, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Implementation in the US

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase existing Medicare taxes, a system that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – wealthier individuals would pay more than those earning less. This includes both worker and company payments. Similar to many federal defense, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the system could be managed to third-party administrators rather than a government office.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program would be a significant advantage for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford better plans. It would render management much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and Medicare taxes, instead of individual transactions to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would enable it easier for us to budget annual expenditures, rather than going through the complicated (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with major insurers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would be a better understanding of coverage by our employees – as opposed to the current system where they have to interpret the complications of current options. And there would definitely exist less liability for companies as we no longer have access to workers' health histories for risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as they get. But I've learned that public institutions has a significant role in our lives, including national security to funding essential systems. Providing healthcare to all via universal healthcare enhances our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, simpler approach for small businesses which hire more than half of the country's workers and generate half the economic output. It makes it possible employees to be healthier, come to work more often and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Certainly. Given all the healthcare cost increases experienced in recent years, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning effectively. I understand that we're not a compact European nation where major reforms can be readily adopted. However extending universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would still be a better and less expensive approach both for managing medical expenses but providing access for all citizens.

Time for Honest Assessment

As Americans, must tone down our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. The US places significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare globally, based on comprehensive research. Perhaps a bright spot in this current situation could be that we take serious examination at ourselves and agree that big changes need to happen.